Legal Opinion
Hood v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 6, 2002No. 3D01-113PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Because the defendant failed to proffer “the character of the evidence sought to be introduced,” we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by not allowing the defendant, to. reopen his case. See Jones v. State, 745 So.2d 1121, 1122 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).
Affirmed.
GODERICH and GREEN, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gibson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Thomas v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024