Legal Opinion

Hood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 6, 2002No. 3D01-113PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Because the defendant failed to proffer “the character of the evidence sought to be introduced,” we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by not allowing the defendant, to. reopen his case. See Jones v. State, 745 So.2d 1121, 1122 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).

Affirmed.

GODERICH and GREEN, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gibson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  4. Thomas v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024