State v. Lovig
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
CADY, Justice.
In this appeal, we consider whether the district court properly denied the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence gar nered through a warrantless search of an apartment. The district court determined that probable cause and an exigent circumstance existed to justify the limited entry into the apartment by law enforcement officers. The defendant challenges this finding on appeal and seeks suppression of the evidence. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the decision of the district court and remand for further proceedings.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
Shortly after 9:00…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. NitcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- State of Iowa v. Robert Dale Lowe, Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- State of Iowa v. Dale Dean Pettijohn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.