Legal Opinion

Ulicsnik v. Dalrymple

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 11, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a bill to restrain an auditor from collecting certain assets of one Otto G. Horster, and an answer seeking to set aside as fraudulent certain conveyances made by said Horster.

On December 15th, 1925, Horster made an assignment to Louis Kempf. This assignment purported to convey ten shares of the Stuyvesant Development Company and certain bonds valued at $15,000. The present whereabouts of these bonds and their value does not appear. As collateral to this assignment a demand promissory note was given to Kempf in the sum of $35,000, for which there was no consideration, nor was there any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Livermore v. McNairNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1881

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trachman v. TrugmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  2. Kearny Plumbing Supply Co. v. GlandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API