Legal Opinion
Miller v. City of Los Angeles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 27, 2011No. 10-55235PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
661 F.3d 1024 (2011)
Georgia MILLER, individually; Denise Bailey, as Guardian ad Litem for P.A.M.; P.A.M., Jr., a minor, and as his authorized representative as successor in interest to Philip Arthur Miller, deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellant, and
Los Angeles Police Department; William Bratton, Chief of Police; Cesar Mata, Sgt., Defendants.
No. 10-55235.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 9, 2011.
Filed October 27, 2011.
Amy Field (argued), Deputy City Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for appellant City of Los Angeles.
John Burton…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Leroy Haeger v. the Goodyear Tire & Rubber CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Anhing Corp. v. Viet Phu, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Leroy Haeger v. the Goodyear Tire & Rubber CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015