Legal Opinion

In Re Hall

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided April 16, 1998No. 13-97-917-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YANEZ, Justice.

Relators Benjamin Hall and the City of Mercedes seek relief by way of a writ of mandamus from an order entered on December 22,1997 by Judge Benjamin Euresti, Jr., of the 107th District Court in Cameron County. The court ordered Hall to produce certain documents, show cause why he should not be held in contempt for violating a previous court order, and to “cease and desist” from further contact with “any Class Members in this Class Action” (the “San Benito” class action) pending before the court, save and except for the two cities Hall represented. We requested a reply…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. General Motors Corp. v. BloyedTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. 23 Fair empl.prac.cas. 20, 23 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,029 Wesley P. Bernard v. Gulf Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Hampton Hardware, Inc. v. Cotter & Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1994
  5. Nueces County v. De Pena, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. H & R BLOCK, INC. v. Haese, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  2. H & R Block, Inc., H & R Block & Associates, L.P. v. Haese, Ronnie, Nancy Haese, Manuel Jimenez and Teresa Jimenez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API