Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Spearman v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 9, 2013No. CR 12-803Published

1ConcurrenceCourtney Hudson Goodson, Justice

I agree that there is substantial evidence to support Spearman’s convictions. I also concur in the decision to affirm the denial of Spearman’s motion to dismiss, but I do so for a different, more fundamental reason.

Spearman’s motion to dismiss is grounded on an alleged violation of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, codified at Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-95-101 (Repl.2006). However, the Act does not apply in this case because the State of Mississippi is not a party to the interstate agreement. In Smith v. State, 258 Ark. 533, 528 S.W.2d 359 (1975), this court held that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API