Legal Opinion

Tillotson v. Cheetham

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1808PublishedCited by 8 opinions

GOLDEN, at the last term, in behalf of the plaintiff, moved to amend the record in this cause, 1. By inserting the words, “ at the city-hall, in the city of New-Tork” in the memorandum, next after the words, “ before the justices, See. of the same people,” and striking out the words “ here,” after “ brought.” 2. By striking out of the imparlance “ November in November,” and the words “ in the year one thousand eight hundred and six,” and inserting the words, “ February in…

Read the full summary

GOLDEN, at the last term, in behalf of the plaintiff, moved to amend the record in this cause, 1. By inserting the words, “ at the city-hall, in the city of New-Tork” in the memorandum, next after the words, “ before the justices, See. of the same people,” and striking out the words “ here,” after “ brought.” 2. By striking out of the imparlance “ November in November,” and the words “ in the year one thousand eight hundred and six,” and inserting the words, “ February in this same,” between the words “ of” and “ term.” 3. By striking out of the default and interlocutory judgment, the words,…

1Opinion of the Court

Kent, Ch. J.

delivered the opinion of the court. This is a motion for leave to amend the record of judgment, upon the execution of a writ of inquiry of damages, in this cause. The final judgment was given in November term, 1806, and a writ of error was thereupon issued, and in February, 1807, duly returned into the court of errors, with a transcript of the record annexed. At the last session of the court of errors, errors were assigned, and among others, that by the record, it appeared, that an imparlance was given to the defendant, and a continuance entered from November term, 1805, to…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. President of the Bank of the United States v. MossSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  2. Farrand v. BentleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Rew v. BarkerNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  4. Rowell v. BruceSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1831
  5. Carr v. Hills Archimedean Lawn Mower Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API