Legal Opinion

People v. Duff

New York District Court

Decided October 10, 1975Published

1Opinion of the CourtAlfred M. Lama, J.

Defendants, cited for violation of ECL 13-0309 (subd 8), have moved to dismiss the information, claiming that they have been charged improperly.

ECL 13-0309 (subd 8) reads as follows: "The operation, use or placing, for whatever purpose, of dredges, rakes, tongs or other devices for the taking of shellfish in uncertified areas * * * is prohibited.”

In open court the defendants admitted clamming in a closed area by the use of their feet but contended that human feet are not the type of device contemplated by the cited section. The court agrees.

*656It is clear - that the gravamen of the charge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. ShapiroNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. People v. GluboNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. People v. KnopferNew York City Court of Special Sessions · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API