Legal Opinion

State v. Coble

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 16, 2004No. COA03-185PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

Mary Coble (“defendant”) appeals from a judgment dated 4 September 2002 entered consistent with a jury verdict finding her guilty of misdemeanor cruelty to animals. As a result of her conviction, defendant was sentenced to a jail term of forty-five days. We conclude there was no error in defendant’s trial.

The State’s evidence presented at trial beginning on 3 September 2002 tends to show that on 23 May 2001 Scott Townsend (“Townsend”), a deputy with the animal control department, responded to a report of cruelty to animals at defendant’s address. From a vantage point at a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. HollimanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MauerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. DohertyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
  3. State v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  4. State v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API