State v. Coble
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTER, Judge.
Mary Coble (“defendant”) appeals from a judgment dated 4 September 2002 entered consistent with a jury verdict finding her guilty of misdemeanor cruelty to animals. As a result of her conviction, defendant was sentenced to a jail term of forty-five days. We conclude there was no error in defendant’s trial.
The State’s evidence presented at trial beginning on 3 September 2002 tends to show that on 23 May 2001 Scott Townsend (“Townsend”), a deputy with the animal control department, responded to a report of cruelty to animals at defendant’s address. From a vantage point at a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. HollimanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MauerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. DohertyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
- State v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022