Legal Opinion

Northern Light & Power Co. v. Stacher

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 1910No. Civ. No. 628Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Shasta County. Charles M. Head, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion

This is an action to condemn certain riparian rights. A general and special demurrer to the third amended complaint was interposed by certain defendants and sustained by the court without leave to amend. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment. There are twenty-five separate causes of action involving the rights of as many different and separate riparian owners. Three appeared and had judgment, who will hereinafter be referred to as defendants. Each separate cause of action is couched in substantially the same language and the attack upon one may be treated as an attack upon the other two.

From…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Crawford Co. v. HathawayNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Alta Land & Water Co. v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Bigelow v. DraperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. St. Helena Water Co. v. ForbesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API