Legal Opinion
Yau v. District Director of United States Immigration & Naturalization Service
District Court, C.D. California
Decided November 4, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 68-891PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
HAUK, District Judge.
Petitioner filed a petition for judicial review in this Court alleging that respondent’s finding that petitioner did not qualify as a “member of the professions” under Section 203(a) (3), as amended, 8 U.S.C. § 1153(a) (3)1 of the Immigration and Nationality Act is clearly erroneous and contrary to law. Petitioner was seeking a declaration that he is a “member of the professions” pursuant to the aforementioned statute.
Respondent filed a Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b) & (c)2 of the Federal Rules of Civil…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Constantinos Roumeliotis and Panayota Roumeliotis, His Wife v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- Chan Wing Cheung A/K/A Bill Woo v. James A. Hamilton, Jr., District Director, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
- Todaro v. PedersonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1961
- Panagiotis Kalatjis, AKA Peter Kallas v. George K. Rosenberg, as District Director, Immigration and Naturalizationservice, Los Angeles, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Maggiore Bakery, Inc. v. EsperdyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cynthia Asuncion v. District Director of the United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Acupuncture Center of Washington v. BrennanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- Chong Shik Ahn v. District Director of the United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Hird/Blaker Corp. v. SavaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- YAUBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1968