Legal Opinion

Basin, Inc. v. Federal Energy Administration

Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1977No. 5-21PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

This case involves the validity of 10 C.F.R. § 211.63, a regulation of the Federal Energy Administration (FEA hereinafter) commonly known as the “supplier-purchaser freeze” rule. In 1973, Congress passed the Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act1 in response to problems that it perceived in the petroleum industry. A notable cause of these difficulties was the Arab oil embargo. The Act required FEA to allocate the distribution of domestically produced crude oil in pursuance of certain stated objectives, and Section 211.63 was promulgated by FEA for this purpose.

Section 211.63 has…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Democratic National CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Carruth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  2. Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Federal Energy AdministrationTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Detroit Zoological Society v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  5. Naph-Sol Refining Co. v. Murphy Oil Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API