Bulman v. King
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
1. “The sworn statement contained in the motion to dismiss, not being denied or otherwise responded to, will be taken as true.” Jones v. Jones, 207 Ga. 698 (63 S. E. 2d 895). The only question and subject matter of the cause having become moot by the actual holding of the election, a reversal of the judgment sustaining the general demurrers to the amended petition would be ineffectual, and the motion to dismiss the writ of error must be sustained. Smith v. Jeffries, 188 Ga. 649 (4 S. E. 2d 637); Abernathy v. Dorsey, 189 Ga. 72 (5 S. E. 2d 39); Brockett v. Maxwell, 200 Ga. 38 (35…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abernathy v. DorseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Smith v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Brockett v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Cravey v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Davison v. City of SummervilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Berrie v. BaucknechtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Beatty v. MyrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963