Legal Opinion

Westbrook v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 28, 1887No. 5458PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Haskell. Tried below before the Hon. J. V. Cockrell. The opinion in this case sets out the instrument upon which the appellant was convicted of forgery and awarded a term of two years in the penitentiary as punishment. The disposition of the case does not call for a statement of the proof.

1Opinion of the Court

White, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction upon an indictment, the charging part of which is that defendant “did, then and there, without lawful authority, and with intent to injure and defraud, willfully and fraudulently make a false instrument in writing, purporting to be the act of another, to wit, the act of C. J. Chapman; which said false instrument is to the tenor following: ‘ Sept. 20, 1886. Mr. E. A. Bledsoe. Dear Sir: Please sell Mr. Westbrook twenty or twenty-five dollars worth of goods, and I will be down in 8 or 10 days his and settle for them. C. J. +…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BeanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Keagan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Uppenkamp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Flanagan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Flanagan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API