Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Aerotek, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 20, 2012No. Case No. 09-cv-12932Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (docket no. J,0) AND GRANTING AEROTEK’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (docket no. 33)

STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, District Judge.

Bennita Crawford filed this employment discrimination action pro se on July 24, 2009. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge for all pretrial proceedings. Crawford subsequently retained counsel. Aerotek moved for summary judgment on April 13, 2011. The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”) on February 17, 2012, after taking the motions under consideration. He suggests that the Court grant Aerotek’s…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API