Legal Opinion

Billingsley v. Kelly

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 2, 1971No. [No. 317, September Term, 1970.]PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

Henry E. Billingsley (Billingsley) joined with Paul J. Kelly and Jack R. Huffner (Appellees or Kelly or Huffner when referred to individually) to form Urban Systems, Inc. (Corporation), a Maryland corporation, in the fall of 1966. The purpose of the Corporation was to procure private and governmental contracts to perform studies of urban problems. Billingsley, Kelly and Huffner each owned a one-third interest in the Corporation and together constituted its board of directors. The Corporation met with less than immediate financial success and became indebted to each of the three principals for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. FicklinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  2. Eisenberg, Admin. v. Air Cond., Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  3. Molesworth v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  4. Katski v. BoehmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. District Agency Co. v. Suburban Delivery Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Geiselman v. Cramer Financial Group, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  2. Corporacion Venezolana De Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  3. Bankers Trust (Delaware) v. 236 Beltway Inv.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
  4. Georg v. Metro Fixtures Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  5. CITY NAT. BANK OF MIAMI NA v. WernickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API