Legal Opinion

Medlock v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 22, 1986No. 470-85PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

2Per curiam

This is a probation revocation case involving inter alia the construction given Article 42.12, § 8(c), V.A.C.C.P., in Stanfield v. State, 638 S.W.2d 127 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1982) PDR granted, which the Dallas Court of Appeals followed in this cause. Medlock v. State, 688 S.W.2d 664 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1985).

Our opinion on original submission is withdrawn. This Court has reconsidered its prior decision in Stanfield v. State, delivered May 7, 1986, and has now concluded that § 8(c) is applicable though there are allegations that one or more other conditions…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stanfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Medlock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Washington v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  2. Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Carlton Frank Cummins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API