Legal Opinion

Corum v. Hubbard

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1904No. 13,663PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Kingman district court; P. B. Gillett, judge. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Atkinson, J.:

This is a suit by William W. Hubbard to foreclose a mortgage for $1400 on a tract of 160 acres of land in Kingman county. It is the second foreclos*609ure of this mortgage. The defendant, L. M. Corum, plaintiff in error here, purchased the premises after they had been encumbered. By error in the former suit in making the owner of the legal title to the premises a party defendant to the action, the name of L. M. Crum instead of L. M. Corum was used. Service was had by publication, defendant made no appearance, judgment in foreclosure was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blackwood v. ShafferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  2. Hubbard v. CorumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. White v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Slimmer v. RiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Richardson Gas & Oil Co. v. City of AltoonaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Holland v. BeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API