Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 29, 2000No. D035689PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, J.
This proceeding concerns the extent to which the attorney-client and work product privileges may be used by a public prosecutor who is the subject of an ongoing criminal investigation to prevent documents seized pursuant to validly issued and executed search warrants 1 from being reviewed by law enforcement. In this criminal investigation of real party in interest Deputy District Attorney (DDA) Peter J. Longanbach (Longanbach), 2 the People of the State of California, through the Office of the California Attorney General (AG), petition for a writ of mandate/prohibition after…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- In re StierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Tucker Ellis LLP v. Superior Court of City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- GREEN & SHINEE v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Tucker Ellis v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.