Legal Opinion

Ricci v. Apfel

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 2001No. CIV. A. 00-2253PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BECHTLE, District Judge.

Presently before the court are plaintiff Ronald D. Ricci’s (“Plaintiff’) and defendant Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (“Commissioner”) cross-motions for summary judgment, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells (“Magistrate Judge”). For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment, and deny Plaintiffs motion.

I. BACKGROUND

This is a judicial review of the Commissioner’s final decision denying Plaintiffs claim…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Henderson v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rivera v. GoodeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Winward v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2014
  3. DINGMAN v. SAULDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. HILDRETH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
  5. KRYSTOPOWICZ v. SAULDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API