Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Philadelphia v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, District 33

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 7, 2013No. 27 EM 2013Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING STATEMENT

Chief Justice CASTILLE.

The Court has declined to grant the City’s Application for Extraordinary Relief. For the reasons that follow, I dissent.

This case involves a protracted labor dispute with respect to non-professional, non-uniformed civil service employees of the City of Philadelphia (“City”). In April of 2008, the City and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, District 33 (“District Council 33”) entered into negotiations for a successor agreement to a collective bargaining agreement that was due to expire on June 30, 2008. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BetheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Burrell Education Ass'n v. Burrell School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Central Dauphin Education Ass'n v. Central Dauphin School District, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API