Hayden v. Pataki
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1DissentKatzmann, Circuit Judge
As a matter of public policy, I do not doubt that it may well be rational for the state to enact laws — applied fairly and equally, regardless of race, creed, color, religion or gender — that deprive felons of the right to vote while serving their sentences. At the same time, I am mindful that the task of a court is not to make policy or to substitute its views for that of political branches, but rather to be faithful to the words of a statute. In the case at hand, Congress stated:
No voting qualification or prerequisite to voting or standard, practice, or procedure shall be imposed or applied…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Let W. Lee v. Bankers Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Hayden v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.