Legal Opinion

Florida Bar v. Von Zamft

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 21, 2002No. SC95831PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review the report of the referee recommending that disciplinary measures be imposed upon respondent, Michael Lee Von Zamft, for alleged ethical breaches. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

FACTS

At the time of these events, Michael Von Zamft (Von Zamft) was employed by the Office of the State Attorney in the Elev*387enth Judicial Circuit. In April and May 1998 that office was prosecuting a capital case. Von Zamft and the judge presiding over the case were friends; however, Von Zamft was not involved with the case. At an April 1998 status conference, the assistant state…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. The Florida Bar v. JordanSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  3. In the Matter of OrfanelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. In re ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, BemisArizona Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. Erwin RosenbergSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
  2. Thompson v. Florida BarDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API