Legal Opinion
Ford v. County of Carlisle
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided June 1, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CULLEN, Commissioner.
The fiscal court of Carlisle County contracted to purchase 10 Seiscor electric voting machines for use in elections. A citizen and taxpayer brought action to enjoin purchase and use of the machines on the grounds that they do not comply with statutory requirements and will not function reliably. After a three-day trial, during which one of the machines was subjected to thorough and exhaustive tests and demonstrations, the circuit court handed down an opinion finding that the machines do comply with statutory .requirements and qualify for use in elections in this state,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dorman, Banking Com'r v. DellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- City of Middlesboro v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Standard Printing Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
3Cited by3 opinions
- McKnight v. State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1963
- Koo v. Commonwealth Department for Adult & Technical EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1995
- A & W Equipment Co. v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964