Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schneiderman v. Sesanstein

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1929No. 21290Published

1DissentAllen, J.

I dissent from the decision of the majority herein upon the ground that it is in conflict with the weight of authority in the United States. Also in my judgment the ordinance in question does not conflict with the statute, and, furthermore, the regulation of the speed of traffic upon the streets of a municipality is an exercise of the power of local self-government, and hence the decision in this case contravenes the express provision of Section 3 of Article XVIII of the Constitution that municipalities shall have all powers of local self-government.

The decision runs counter to the weight of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Adler v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Kalich v. KnappOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Sims v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API