Legal Opinion
Charlene Sennewald v. University of Minnesota and the Regents of the University of Minnesota
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 23, 1988No. 87-5260PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.
Charlene Sennewald appeals from a final judgment entered by the District Court1 for the District of Minnesota in favor of the University of Minnesota and the Regents of the University, denying her claim of sex discrimination under the provisions of the consent decree entered in Rajender v. University of Minnesota, No. 4-73-435 (D.Minn. Aug. 13, 1980) (Rajender). For reversal, Sennewald argues that the district court erred in (1) ruling no violation of the consent decree because the court misconstrued the consent decree and (2) ruling no violation of Title VII of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. KnoteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. KnoteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Charlene Sennewald v. University of Minnesota and the Regents of the University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Edward L. Simmons v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Little Rock School District v. North Little Rock School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.