Gonzalez v. Pacific Fruit Express Co.
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion of the Court
FOLEY, District Judge.
Defendant moves to' dismiss upon the ground that the cause of action, if any, alleged in plaintiff’s complaint, accrued more than three years prior to the commencement of this action and is, therefore, barred by the Nevada statute of limitations, § 8524, 1929 N.C.L., “* * * Within three years: 1. An action upon a liability created by statute, other than a penalty or forfeiture. * * * ”
At the hearing of this motion, counsel for defendant consented that the complaint could be amended so as to contain an allegation in Paragraph I thereof that the plaintiff was at all the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Abram v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Woods v. Hughes Oil Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Peterson v. SorensenUtah Supreme Court · 1937
- Stornelli v. United States Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shelton v. ParisOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Torrealba v. KesmetisNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. Fallon County v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1972
- Nevada Land & Mortgage Co. v. LambNevada Supreme Court · 1974
- Bank of New York Mellon v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.