Legal Opinion

Portman v. Steveco, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 7, 1983No. 2-383A93PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Presiding Judge.

Thomas M. Portman, the surviving spouse of Janet L. Portman, applied for maximum death benefits, pursuant to the Workmen's Compensation Act, following the death of Janet which occurred by reason of an accident arising out of and in the course of her employment. His claim was denied and the Industrial Board of Indiana found that he did not qualify for benefits pursuant to Ind.Code § 22-8-3-19 (1982 Burns Supp.). On appeal, Portman challenges the constitutionality of Ind.Code § 22-8-8-19 and claims that the statute constitutes a denial of equal protection in violation…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Orr v. OrrSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Califano v. GoldfarbSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Wengler v. Druggists Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. State Ex Rel. White v. Hilgemann, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Montgomery v. Supervised Administration of the Estate of MontgomeryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. K-Mart Corp. v. NovakIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. K-Mart Corp. v. NovakIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API