Beck v. Studio Kenji, Ltd.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The motion court erred in concluding that questions of fact existed regarding whether Vance and third-party plaintiff Honigstock were in “the functional equivalent of privity.” For a plaintiff to state a cause of action for negligent misrepresentation based on the existence of the functional equivalent of privity, three conditions must be satisfied: the defendant must have been aware that its representations were to be used for a particular purpose or purposes; the defendant must have intended that the other party rely on the representations for such purpose or purposes; and there must have…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ossining Union Free School District v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Children's Corner Learning Center v. A. Miranda Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Richards Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Washington Group International, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kleinberg v. 516 West 19th LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- 63rd & 3rd NYC LLC v. Advanced Contr. Solutions, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024