Legal Opinion

Beck v. Studio Kenji, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 8, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The motion court erred in concluding that questions of fact existed regarding whether Vance and third-party plaintiff Honigstock were in “the functional equivalent of privity.” For a plaintiff to state a cause of action for negligent misrepresentation based on the existence of the functional equivalent of privity, three conditions must be satisfied: the defendant must have been aware that its representations were to be used for a particular purpose or purposes; the defendant must have intended that the other party rely on the representations for such purpose or purposes; and there must have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ossining Union Free School District v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Children's Corner Learning Center v. A. Miranda Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Richards Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Washington Group International, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kleinberg v. 516 West 19th LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. 63rd & 3rd NYC LLC v. Advanced Contr. Solutions, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API