Pokorny v. Stastny
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
The only real issue presented is whether the trial court erred in nonsuiting the plaintiff. More specifically, the question is whether the determination of the intent of the language of the release presented a jury question as to defendant’s alleged liability for plaintiff’s claims for a $5,000 service fee and for $2,900 business losses. It did.
The trial court perceived the issue to be whether the release was a complete integration of all the previous negotiations and agreements between the parties. In such a case the intent of the parties is the critical inquiry. The trial court specifically…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Doyle v. TeasdaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Plummer v. LeonhardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Fosila v. O'DonnellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Rensink v. WallenfangWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Jandrt v. Milwaukee Auto InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
3Cited by8 opinions
- Radlein v. Industrial Fire & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Swanigan v. State Farm InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Brown v. Hammermill Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Krenz v. Medical Protective Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Gielow v. NapiorkowskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.