Legal Opinion
Troutman v. International Harvester Co.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided April 10, 1948No. 1376PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SHELBOURNE, Chief Judge.
This action is now before this Court upon two motions, both filed by defendant and third party plaintiff, International Harvester Company and third party defendant Struck Construction Company.
The first motion is to set aside the verdict of the Jury and to enter a judgment' in favor of the defendant International Harvester Company, a procedure provided by Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Title 28 U.S.C.A.
The second motion is to set aside the verdict of the Jury and the judgment entered thereon and to grant a new trial.
The action was filed July 7, 1947…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ToopsSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Sutherland v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- International Harvester Co. v. TroutmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949