Legal Opinion

United States v. Lorenzana-Cordon

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 30, 2015No. Criminal No. 2003-0331PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge

Presently before the Court is the Government’s [614] Motion to Admit Other Crimes Evidence at Trial (“Motion”). For the reasons stated below,' upon consideration of the pleadings, 1 the relevant legal authorities, and the record as a whole, the Government’s Motion to- Admit Other Crimes Evidence at Trial is GRANTED-IN-PART and -HELD-IN-ABEYANCE-IN-PART. • Specifically, upon close review of the record currently before the Court, the Court finds that the following evidence shall be admitted evidence as evidence intrinsic of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. TarantinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Bowie, JuanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Alexander, JoeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Dennis L. Mitchell, United States of America v. Paul B. Campbell, A/K/A SoupCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Burch, Larry D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. ThorneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API