United States v. Lorenzana-Cordon
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
Presently before the Court is the Government’s [614] Motion to Admit Other Crimes Evidence at Trial (“Motion”). For the reasons stated below,' upon consideration of the pleadings, 1 the relevant legal authorities, and the record as a whole, the Government’s Motion to- Admit Other Crimes Evidence at Trial is GRANTED-IN-PART and -HELD-IN-ABEYANCE-IN-PART. • Specifically, upon close review of the record currently before the Court, the Court finds that the following evidence shall be admitted evidence as evidence intrinsic of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. TarantinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Bowie, JuanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Alexander, JoeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Dennis L. Mitchell, United States of America v. Paul B. Campbell, A/K/A SoupCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Burch, Larry D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. ThorneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020