Ott v. Schneiter
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By LEMERT, PJ.
Appellants jointly and severally have appealed this cause on questions of law, and complain of the proceedings below upon the assignment of errors contained in the petition in error filed in this cause and which are as follow:
1. The damages allowed by the jury were excessive, and appear to have been given under influence of passion and prejudice.
2. The verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient evidence.
3. The verdict of the jury is contrary to law.
4. The court erred in the admission of evidence, and its charge to the jury, to all of which the appellants at the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Falls Lumber Co. v. HemanOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
- Stephenson v. Upper Valley Family Care, Inc., 07ca12 (6-13-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008