Legal Opinion
In Re Wells
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided March 16, 2001No. 17-04567PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEBTOR’S MOTION TO WAIVE ALABAMA POWER COMPANY POSTPETITION DEPOSIT REQUIREMENT AND ALLOWING DEBTOR TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT IN WHICH THE AUTOMATIC STAY WOULD NOT APPLY TO ALABAMA POWER AND THE DEBTORS WOULD CONTINUE THEIR PREPETITION ARRANGEMENT WITH ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
MARGARET A. MAHONEY, Chief Judge.
These cases are before the Court on the Motions of the Debtors to waive the Alabama Power Company postpetition deposit requirement in exchange for the following agreement that would be incorporated in the Debtors’ chapter 13 plans:
The debtor agrees to continue paying…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Smith, Richardson & Conroy, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1985
- Hanratty v. Philadelphia Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- In Re EplingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
3Cited by1 opinion
- Steinebach v. Tucson Electric Power Co. (In Re Steinebach)District Court, D. Arizona · 2004