Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Jordan v. City of Rome

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 20, 1992No. A91A2148Published

1ConcurrenceBeasley, Judge

1. I concur in the first two divisions but not in all that is written in them. Sovereign immunity is a defense rather than an inroad on one of the elements of a tort. Since it is not invoked here, the first question is whether the defendants owed a legal duty to plaintiffs.

The 1983 Constitution of Georgia provides the foundation for such a duty in its second paragraph: “Protection to person and property is the paramount duty of government and shall be impartial and complete.” Art. I, Sec. I, Par. II. Whether a duty to Patricia Jordan arose from the circumstances conveyed to the police,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ellington v. Tolar Consruction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Bishop v. Mangal Bhai Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Storer Communications, Inc. v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. SAVANNAH BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. WeinerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API