Legal Opinion
Midler v. Heinowitz
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 16, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
10 N.J. 123 (1952)
89 A.2d 458
HARRY L. MIDLER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ABRAHAM M. HEINOWITZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued May 5, 1952.
Decided June 16, 1952.
Mr. Joseph Kraemer argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Andrew B. Crummy argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Crummy & Consodine, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR., J.
Under an order of reference entered in the former Court of Chancery on January 12, 1945, an account was taken by a special master of the joint venture engaged in by the parties during 1938 in the buying…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Hager v. WeberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Midler v. HeinowitzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Matter of Eldridge v. . Endicott, Johnson Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Temple v. Storch Trucking Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hagerman v. Lewis Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953