Finjan, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
William Alsup, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
In this patent infringement action, each side moves for summary judgment on one asserted claim. For the reasons stated below, the patent owner's motion for summary judgment of infringement is DENIED . The accused infringer's motion for summary judgment of non-infringement and on damages is GRANTED to the extent stated below and motion to strike is DENIED AS MOOT . The parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why judgment on the patent owner's motion should not be entered in favor of the accused infringer.
STATEMENT
Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Amgen Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (Now Known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Susan M. Maxwell v. J. Baker, Inc., and Prange Way, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Finjan LLC v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Finjan, LLC v. Qualys Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Finjan, LLC. v. Cisco Systems Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020