Legal Opinion
Security Mutual Life Insurance v. DiPasquale
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 3, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered January 28, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant leave to amend his answer with respect to the second counterclaim, and paragraphs 59 to 99, of his proposed second amended answer, and order, same court and Justice, entered June 26, 2000, which, upon reargument, adhered to the January 28, 2000 order, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The proposed counterclaim under General Business Law § 349 is not viable because the counterclaim “essentially alleges a private contract dispute over policy coverage that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New York University v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Schunk v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Watts v. Town of GardinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Korn v. First UNUM Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Pellechia & Pellechia, Inc. v. American National Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shou Fong Tam v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- JD&K Associates, LLC v. Selective Insurance Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Sutton Associates v. LexisNexisNew York Supreme Court · 2003
- Caterpillar Insurance v. Metro Construction EquitiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Caterpillar Insurance v. Metro Construction EquitiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015