Legal Opinion

People v. Burgenmeyer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 2000No. Docket 112173PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant stands convicted of drug charges and of possessing a firearm during the commission of a felony. The Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction, which we likewise affirm today. However, we write to clarify the analysis to be employed in similar felony-firearm prosecutions.

i

In August 1990, defendant Albert L. Burgenmeyer was sharing a house with a man named Allen L. Foster, whom he had met when Mr. Foster began dating the defendant’s sister. The defendant operated a tow-truck service, and Mr. Foster worked for him. Mr. Foster also sold cocaine from the home.

Raiding the home in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. JollyMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. KonradMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. LawMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. RodriguezMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. CouzensMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In Re Investigation of March 1999 RiotsMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 2000

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API