Legal Opinion

City of Somerset v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 21, 2005No. 2003-CA-001522-MR, 2003-CA-001523-MRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINTON, Judge.

A group of taxpayers, living in an area annexed by the City of Somerset, brought a class action lawsuit in the Pulaski Circuit Court, alleging that the City had improperly collected ad valorem property taxes from them. The circuit court agreed, concluding that the City’s assessment and levy of taxes violated statutory requirements. Later, the court concluded that although the taxpayers were legally entitled to a refund, they were precluded from recovering funds in a class action lawsuit. The Court also concluded that the taxpayers had failed ■ to exhaust administrative…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Eversole v. EversoleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Swiss Oil Corporation v. Shanks, AuditorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. Board of Education v. Logan Aluminum, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Whitley County Board of Education v. MeadorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  5. Board of Education v. TaulbeeKentucky Supreme Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jefferson County Board of Education v. Fell ex rel. L.F.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  2. McWilliams v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Smith v. Teachers' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017
  4. Clark v. BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2006
  5. Ashley Ahrens v. Daniel FendleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API