Legal Opinion

State v. Ballard

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 1956No. 29410PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE P. ADAMS, Special Judge.

A jury in the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction found defendant guilty of intimidating a state’s witness under the first portion of Section 557.090 RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S. (all statutory references are to RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S., unless otherwise noted). ’ His punishment was set at six months imprisonment in the city workhouse. Following an unsuccessful motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.

On June 13, 1954, Mrs. Helen Weichelt was employed as a ;waitress in a cocktail lounge in the City of St. Louis, Missouri. About 1:15 a. m. on that day, while Paul Baykowski…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  3. State ex rel. Butler v. FosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  4. State v. Schwartzman Service, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Flanary v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HobokinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. State v. HookMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. State v. LaPlanteMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State v. ShellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. State v. DaughertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API