United States v. Rozier
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Christopher Rozier appeals his conviction and sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) for possession of a firearm and ammunition by a convicted felon. Rozier challenges the constitutionality of the statute and his sentence. We find that United States Supreme Court and Eleventh Circuit precedent clearly states that both Rozier’s conviction and sentence are constitutional. Therefore, we affirm.
I
Christopher Rozier has spent a considerable part of his life in the criminal justice system. The result of this life experience is that by October 13, 2007, Rozier was a convicted felon with several felony…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- McKune v. LileSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Richardson v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- United States v. MarzzarellaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- United States v. RahimiSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
- Rickey I. Kanter v. William P. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Bryan Range v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.