Legal Opinion

Foley v. Brunswick Traction Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 21, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fort, J.

In this case, but three grounds were seriously urged for a new trial. The first related to an alleged error of the trial justice in admitting a certain map in evidence; the second was that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence, and the third, that, the verdict was excessive.

On the plaintiff’s direct case Asher Atkinson, a civil engineer, was called and testified that he had made a map of the locality of the accident at a time when he was in the employ of the defendant. On cross-examination the defendant produced a map, which he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Foley v. Brunswick Traction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  2. Hustis v. James A. Banister Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Porter v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  2. State v. MannoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. Dubelbeiss v. Town of West HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  4. Minard v. West Jersey & Seashore Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API