Legal Opinion

Kowalczyk v. Ricci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 16, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The complaint, wherein plaintiffs alleged that David E. Kowalczyk (plaintiff) was improperly terminated from his position in violation of his rights pursuant to the Civil Service Law, presents “ ‘the classic formulation of an article 78 proceeding’ ” (Broderick v Board of Educ., 253 AD2d 836, 837, lv denied 93 NY2d 802, quoting Foster v City of New York, 157 AD2d 516, 518; Vanmaenen v Hewlett-Woodmere Pub. Schools, 226 AD2d 151; Conklin…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Broderick v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Foster v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Conklin v. Town of RamapoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Vanmaenen v. Hewlett-Woodmere Public SchoolsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rodriguez v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API