Legal Opinion

Kashef v. BNP Paribas SA

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 18, 2025No. 1:16-cv-03228Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ENTESAR OSMAN KASHEF et al., ORDER \ Plaintiffs, □ 16 Civ. 3228 (AKH) -against- : BNP PARIBAS SA, et al., Defendants. □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ X ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, U.S.D.J.: I previously held that Defendants’ plea of guilty in United States v. BNP Paribas, 14 Cr. 460 (S.D.N.Y.), and its admissions are generally admissible, subject to agreement, or further order, as to the precise statements that could be read to the jury. See ECF No. 701; see also Kashef v. BNP Paribas, S.A., 16 Civ. 3228 (AKH),

2025…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Benitez, Appeal of Alfredo Peralta-MatosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. ThiamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API