Scisson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIAN, Judge.
The offense is embezzlement of property over the value of $50; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.
This court is without jurisdiction to pass upon the merits of the case owing to the fact that the recognizance on appeal does not comply with the legal requirements, in that it fails to state that appellant was convicted of a felony. This is an essential statutory requisite. Article 817, C. C. P.; Read v. State, 109 Texas Crim. Rep., 314, 4 S. W. (2d) 547; Wright v. State, 117 Texas Crim. Rep., 485, 35 S. W. (2d) 413; Friday v. State, 117 Texas Crim.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Read v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Friday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of San Angelo v. DeutschTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Hanna v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.