Legal Opinion
Furbay v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided May 4, 2000No. 31857PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
On appeal from a judgment of conviction of first degree murder and robbery, Harold Furbay argues that (1) his right to a speedy trial was violated, (2) his motion for self-representation was improperly denied, (3) there was insufficient evidence to convict him of murder and robbery, and (4) he was denied a fair penalty hearing. We reject Furbay’s contentions and affirm his conviction and sentence.
In late 1991, Furbay met Max Combs at a truck stop in El Paso, Texas. Combs allowed Furbay to join him as he journeyed to Elko, Nevada. Their trip was interrupted when a Lake Mead park ranger…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by15 opinions
- Holloway v. BarrettNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- Atkins (James) v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- BURNSIDE (TIMOTHY) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY/DIRECT)Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
- BURNSIDE (TIMOTHY) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY/DIRECT)Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
- Brewer v. ReubartDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.