Pacific Employers Insurance v. AXA Belgium S.A.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GOLDBERG, District Judge.
The dispute between the parties in this case involves an alleged breach of a reinsurance contract Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) or, in the alternative, under the doctrine of forum non conveniens. For the reasons set forth below. I will grant Defendant’s motion,
I. BACKGROUND
A. Facts Pertinent to Jurisdiction
Plaintiff, Pacific Employers Insurance Company (PEIC), is a Pennsylvania company whose current principal place of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- BARBER v. DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- BARBER v. DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- LEHRER v. BLUE MOUNTAIN RESORTDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- Lehrer v. Blue Mountain ResortDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024