Legal Opinion

Overstreet v. Canadian Pacific Airlines

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 21, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint upon the following grounds: (1) that the law of New York would not countenance the maintenance of this suit in the New York courts and that the Federal Court should follow this doctrine under Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188, (2) that the maintenance of this suit would place an unreasonable burden upon commerce with foreign nations in violation of Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 of the Constitution, (3) forum non conveniens, (4) that the service of the summons should be set aside on the ground…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Inter-Island Steam Navigation Co. v. Territory of HawaiiSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Inter-Island Steam Nav. Co. v. Territory of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  4. Shulman v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  5. Wadell v. Green Textile Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wahl v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API