Mead Johnson & Co. v. Carlton Drug, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
This is an application for a temporary injunction in a Feld-Crawford action (General Business Law, § 369-a et seq.). Neither the moving nor the answering *952papers are as complete or as adequate as they could and should be. But, in the peculiar circumstances of this case, I shall not weigh the respective merits of the controversy on the basis of what is presented in the four corners of the respective papers submitted. The chronology of the controversy and of its submission to the court for resolution alone is, in my mind, the decisive consideration.
It is established law that, in order for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Girard Holding Corp. v. HollanderNew York Supreme Court · 1949
- Woodburn v. HyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schoeman v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1971